- 形勢與政策論文 推薦度:
- 自我評估 推薦度:
- 人才聘用合同 推薦度:
- 人才招聘合同 推薦度:
- 資產(chǎn)評估報告 推薦度:
- 相關(guān)推薦
國際化導(dǎo)向高校人才引進(jìn)政策評估論文
中文摘要
隨著知識經(jīng)濟(jì)的全球化發(fā)展,世界各國政治、文化、科技都相繼走向國際化,因而我們需從國際競爭力的角度重新審視我們的高等教育。近年來我國高等教育實現(xiàn)了歷史性跨越發(fā)展,正在從高等教育大國向高等教育強(qiáng)國邁進(jìn),發(fā)展的導(dǎo)向是建設(shè)若干所世界一流大學(xué)和一批國際知名的高水平大學(xué)。為實現(xiàn)該目標(biāo),我國各高校都在積極探索提高高等教育水平、提升高校國際化水平的改革之路。其中,被國內(nèi)外廣泛認(rèn)可的戰(zhàn)略發(fā)展關(guān)鍵因素是建設(shè)一支國際化高水平的教師隊伍,教師隊伍國際化是高校國際化的必然要求。
現(xiàn)階段相對于世界一流高校,我國高校的國際化人才尚相當(dāng)匱乏。為改變這種局面,中央、各省市實施了多項舉措,出臺了多類人才引進(jìn)支持計劃,以吸引更多海外優(yōu)秀人才回國工作。以這些支持計劃為依托,結(jié)合自身特點,各高校制定并正在實施多項國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策。這些政策是具有國際化導(dǎo)向的公共政策,因而十分有必要對其開展評估研究。通過對國際化導(dǎo)向的高校人才引進(jìn)政策的制定過程、執(zhí)行過程及政策影響等方面進(jìn)行評估,能夠在政策制定過程中有機(jī)地實現(xiàn)決策科學(xué)化與民主化這一對矛盾的辯證統(tǒng)一,能夠及時發(fā)現(xiàn)執(zhí)行中存在的問題并迅速加以調(diào)整,能夠為政策是否延續(xù)、變更或停止提供依據(jù),對新的人才引進(jìn)政策的制定和創(chuàng)新提供借鑒參考。
基于對政策評估理論的理解分析,本文認(rèn)為政策評估是:通過制定科學(xué)的評估標(biāo)準(zhǔn),選擇恰當(dāng)?shù)脑u估方法,對政策的制定過程、執(zhí)行過程、實施效果的全方位綜合考評,并給予評價、判斷和總結(jié)的行為活動。在政策評估的實施過程中,可以針對不同的評估主體、評估目標(biāo)和評估現(xiàn)狀,在對評估方法和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行選擇和取舍的基礎(chǔ)上,對評估對象的某個階段、某幾個階段或整體進(jìn)行單次、多次或持續(xù)的評估。目前,國內(nèi)外對高校國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策的評估研究工作開展較少,取得的評估研究成果則更少。因此,本文針對上海高校(四所 985 高校)國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策進(jìn)行梳理,分析了這一系列政策的特征,結(jié)合政策評估的新趨勢構(gòu)建了上海高校國際化導(dǎo)向人才引進(jìn)政策的評估機(jī)制,分析在對高校國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策的制定過程、執(zhí)行結(jié)果、實施效果等方面所涉及的評估要素,選取相應(yīng)的評估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、評估模型和評估方法。本文主要包括以下內(nèi)容:
1、在政策制定過程中從形式維度進(jìn)行評估,考慮政策所涉及不同人群的民主性和多元利益平衡性、該政策與其它政策法規(guī)的系統(tǒng)性,以此為評估要素確定相關(guān)評估標(biāo)準(zhǔn),選擇利益相關(guān)人模型為評估模型。
2、在政策執(zhí)行過程中從目標(biāo)達(dá)成維度進(jìn)行評估,該維度包括數(shù)據(jù)變化和政策效果兩方面。在數(shù)據(jù)變化的評估中以師資數(shù)據(jù)變化作為評估要素,選擇目標(biāo)獲取模型作為評估模型。在政策效果的評估中以執(zhí)行政策后高校在人才培養(yǎng)、科技創(chuàng)新、社會服務(wù)、文化傳承創(chuàng)新等方面的變化為評估要素,選擇綜合評估模型為評估模型,考察政策執(zhí)行的效果。
3、在政策的實施影響方面從政策效應(yīng)維度進(jìn)行評估,考慮政策實施后所產(chǎn)生的預(yù)期和非預(yù)期、積極與消極的多方面影響,以政策實施影響對政策制定者和執(zhí)行者、高校自身和社會、國內(nèi)和國際影響等多種影響為評估要素,選取反映該影響的具體指標(biāo)作為評估標(biāo)準(zhǔn),選擇側(cè)面影響評估模型和自由目標(biāo)評估模型進(jìn)行評估。
關(guān)鍵詞:人才引進(jìn)政策;國際化導(dǎo)向;上海高校;政策評估
Abstract
With the development of the globalization of knowledge economy, politics,culture, science and technology in all countries of the world have to go global, weneed new look from the perspective of international competitiveness of our highereducation. In recent years, Chinas higher education has achieved a historic leapforward development, is from the big country of higher education to a powerfulnation.One major goal of the development and reform of education is to build anumber of world-class universities and a number of internationally renowneduniversities in China.To achieve this goal, Chinese universities are exploring differentways to improve their higher education and internationalization.One widely acceptedway is to build international faculty of high quality, since such faculty is primarilyrequired by university internationalization and it is completely an importantguarantee for building world first-class universities.
At present when compared to world first-class universities, Chinese universitiesare still in great shortage of international faculty. To change this situation, Chinesecentral and local governments have issued a number of talent plans with an intentionof attracting outstanding overseas talents to come back and workdomestically.Accordingly, many universities started dedicatedinternationalization-oriented talent introduction policies based on these talent plansto recruit excellent new faculty. As belonging to public policies, these policies deserveserious evaluation. The evaluation for them is necessary and quite crucial forscientific and democratic decisions making, flaws detecting in implementation andquick adjustment etc., all of which ensure that the policies are implemented correctlyand efficiently. Moreover, the evaluation can be used to decide whether or not weshould keep the policies running and even provide reference for new talent andinnovation policies issuing.
Though such evaluation is of great importance, currently there are rarely studiesfocusing on this topic, neither are the known results on it. Thus this thesis focuses onthis topic and is devoted mainly to building an assessing mechanism forinternationalization-oriented university talent introduction policies.The mainproblems investigated in this thesis include how to choose evaluation factors for thedifference phases of such policies and how to select the reasonable evaluationcriteria and pick the evaluation models correspondingly.
This thesis is organized as follows. First, we state the current status ofinternationalization of Chinese universities. Second, we survey someinternationalization-oriented university talent introduction policies and then presentfurther analysis. The major part of the thesis is an establishment of the evaluationmechanism for internationalization-oriented university talent recruiting policies. Ourmain results are as follows:
1. In the making phase of such policies, we propose to carry out the evaluationfrom the form dimension, regarding the democracy and pluralistic interest balance ofdifferent people, and the relations between the policies being assessed and laws aswell as existing policies as assessing factors, selecting related evaluation criteria andthen picking the stakeholder model as the evaluation model.
2. In the policy implementation phase, we put forward to do the evaluationfrom the target acquisition dimension, which consists of two aspects of data changeand policy influence. In the evaluation of data change, we propose to choose datachange of faculty as the assessing factor, and select faculty structure and quality asevaluation criteria and pick the gola-attainment model as the evaluation model.Inthe evaluation of policy influence, we bring forward to choose education, innovation,social serving and cultural inheritance as assessing factors,and select correspondingevaluation criteria and pick the comprehensive model as the evaluation model.
3. In the evaluation of policy effects,we propose to perform the evaluation fromthe policy effect dimension,considering those expected and unexpected, positive andnegative effects of the policies etc. We put forward to choose the effects on policymakers, policy-executers, universities and domestic and international societies asassessing factors, and select corresponding assessing criteria and pick the side-effectsmodel and the goal-free model as the evaluation models.
Key words:Talent Introduction Policy;International Orientation;Universities inShanghai;Policy Evaluation
目錄
摘要
ABSTRACT
1 緒論
1.1 研究背景
1.1.1 我國高校國際化戰(zhàn)略問題的提出
1.1.2 我國高校國際化的現(xiàn)狀分析
1.1.3 我國高校國際化的角色定位和戰(zhàn)略定位
1.1.4 完善國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策是我國高校發(fā)展的必然選擇
1.2 研究綜述
1.2.1 政策評估的內(nèi)涵
1.2.2 政策評估國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀
1.3 研究意義
1.3.1 國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策是高校國際化路徑的核心
1.3.2 政策評估研究對引進(jìn)政策體系的完善具有重要意義
1.4 研究思路與方法
1.5 論文創(chuàng)新之處及難點
2 國際化導(dǎo)向的高校人才引進(jìn)政策概述
2.1 國際化導(dǎo)向人才引進(jìn)政策的'理論基礎(chǔ)
2.1.1 人力資本理論
2.1.2 人才流動理論
2.1.3 高等教育國際化理論
2.2 國際化導(dǎo)向的高校人才引進(jìn)政策的內(nèi)涵
2.2.1 “人才引進(jìn)政策”的含義
2.2.2 “國際化導(dǎo)向”的含義
2.2.3 “國際化導(dǎo)向”與“人才引進(jìn)政策”的聯(lián)系
3 上海高校國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策分析
3.1 我國高校國際化戰(zhàn)略類型分析
3.2 上海高校國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策及特征分析
3.2.1 當(dāng)前高校可申請的國家層面人才引進(jìn)支持計劃
3.2.2 當(dāng)前高?缮暾埖牡胤綄用妫ㄉ虾J校┑娜瞬乓M(jìn)支持計劃
3.2.3 當(dāng)前高校層面(上海市四所 985 高校)的人才引進(jìn)計劃
3.2.4 上海高校國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策的特征分析
3.3 上海高校國際化導(dǎo)向人才引進(jìn)政策評估的現(xiàn)狀
3.4 小結(jié)
4 構(gòu)建國際化導(dǎo)向的高校人才引進(jìn)政策評估機(jī)制
4.1 建立政策評估機(jī)制的邏輯框架
4.2 高校國際化導(dǎo)向的人才引進(jìn)政策的評估機(jī)制構(gòu)建
4.2.1 針對政策制定的過程,從形式維度評估
4.2.2 針對政策執(zhí)行的過程,從目標(biāo)達(dá)成(數(shù)據(jù)變化)維度評估
4.2.3 針對政策執(zhí)行的過程,從目標(biāo)達(dá)成(政策效果)維度評估
4.2.4 針對政策實施的影響,從政策效應(yīng)的維度評估
5 結(jié)論
參考文獻(xiàn)
致謝
【國際化導(dǎo)向高校人才引進(jìn)政策評估論文】相關(guān)文章:
2017杭州人才引進(jìn)政策新規(guī)定06-10
2017深圳新引進(jìn)人才租房補(bǔ)貼政策06-03
2017大慶油田人才引進(jìn)政策05-31
2017杭州人才引進(jìn)落戶政策新規(guī)定06-14
2017天津人才引進(jìn)落戶政策03-13
2017成都人才引進(jìn)落戶新政策07-05
企業(yè)如何引進(jìn)人才測評09-11
基于就業(yè)導(dǎo)向的高校行政管理專業(yè)人才培養(yǎng)模式優(yōu)化設(shè)置探討論文07-26